| 
			 | 
 | News release on the HERS study
 
 
 Study Questions Estrogen-Heart Link, No Estrogen Help for the Heart
 
 By DANIEL Q. HANEY, AP Medical Editor
 
 ANAHEIM, Calif. (AP) - 
      Challenging a medical doctrine that has stood for two decades, a study 
      found no evidence that estrogen 
			supplements protect older women from heart disease.
 
 The findings are 
      likely to confuse doctors and patients alike about the already complicated 
      decision of whether to take estrogen 
			for many years after menopause. Estrogen has both benefits and risks, including an increased chance of breast cancer.
 
 The latest 
      research, released Monday, is the second major study to question the 
      doctrine that hormone replacement is a powerful 
			way to ward off heart disease, the leading killer of older women.
 
 That belief has been a centerpiece of women's health 
      care since the 1980s and has helped make the estrogen pill Premarin the 
      
			most widely prescribed medicine in the United States.
 
 Many doctors think estrogen 
      helps the heart largely because it seems to improve cholesterol levels 
      after women go through menopause. The pills lower total cholesterol and 
      ``bad'' cholesterol, while raising ``good'' cholesterol. Doctors assume 
      these 
			changes translate into less heart disease, even though no experiments definitively prove this.
 
 The first to put the idea to the test was the 
      landmark Heart and Estrogen-progestin Replacement Study - HERS - finished 
      two years ago. Its conclusion shocked doctors: Four years of treatment 
      with combination estrogen and progestin pills failed to lower 
			the risk of new heart attacks in women who already had heart disease.
 
 While some physicians 
      immediately stopped putting their elderly heart patients on long-term 
      hormone replacement, many others 
			have simply refused to believe the results.
 
 The latest 
      report backs up HERS' disturbing conclusion. It studied post-menopausal 
      women with heart disease to see if hormone replacement slows the buildup 
      of fatty deposits in their heart arteries, the major underlying cause of 
      heart attacks. It, too, found no 
			benefit from hormones.
 
 ``These results are indeed 
      somewhat surprising in view of the large body of evidence indicating that 
      estrogen does have a favorable effect on cholesterol and heart disease,'' 
      said the study's director, Dr. David Herrington of Wake Forest University 
      
			Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C.
 
 ``We can't say for certain there is no benefit, but 
      we can rule out a large effect,'' he said. Herrington presented the 
      results in 
			Anaheim at the annual scientific meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
 
 The results are unlikely to settle the question.
 
 Dr. Sidney Smith of the 
      University of North Carolina, a spokesman for the American Heart 
      Association, noted that neither HERS nor the latest study shows whether 
      hormone replacement helps if begun early in menopause or before women 
      develop heart 
			disease.
 
 The answer to those questions should come from the 
      federally sponsored Women's Health Initiative, which is examining the 
      effects 
			of hormone replacement on more than 27,000 women ages 50 to 79. The first results are expected in about five years.
 
 Weighing the risks and 
      benefits of estrogen is already complex. Many women use it for a few years 
      to relieve hot flashes and other ill effects of menopause. Others stay on 
      the hormone for many years to improve cholesterol levels and to prevent 
      brittle bones and 
			vaginal changes, even though the treatment can also increase the risk of breast cancer.
 
 Now doctors are clearly confused and divided over 
      what to expect from estrogen on the heart. However, many agree that even 
      if the hormone proves to be good, its benefit is unlikely to be as large 
      as that of statin drugs, which clearly lower cholesterol and 
			save lives.
 
 In Herrington's 
      study, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, 309 older women 
      with heart disease were randomly assigned to Premarin, the 
      estrogen-progestin combination Prempro or dummy pills. After four years, 
      doctors measured their heart 
			arteries and found no difference in the progression of their disease.
 
 Dr. Marion Limacher of the University of Florida said 
      that until recently, she routinely recommended estrogen supplements for 
      
			older women with heart disease. Now she takes them off hormone replacement, largely as a result of HERS.
 
 Nevertheless, she said, ``some doctors discount HERS as flawed or not to be believed.''
 
 However, Dr. Michael H. Davidson of the Chicago 
      Center for Clinical Research said estrogen may still turn out to be good 
      for 
			many women's hearts. He presented evidence that estrogen plus a statin lower cholesterol more than does a statin
			alone.
 
 ``We have several years to 
      go before we know which women will benefit from hormone replacement 
      therapy and which ones 
			should avoid it,'' Davidson said.
 
 
 |  |